ruminations on international financing and whatever
Monday, March 04, 2013
E.U. asked to cut off Iran's SWIFT access
oil sanctions
European Union leaders are scheduled to meet March 7 to consider a U.S. proposal that the E.U. cut off Iran’s access to a central European financial system that enables global transactions in euros, according to U.S. government officials apprised of the meeting.
U.S. officials have criticized the E.U. for allowing Iran to carry out financial transactions via the European Central Bank (ECB), which U.S. government officials say allows Tehran to skirt Western economic sanctions
Reuters is reporting that a European Union court has ruled
against the EU banking sanctions imposed on one of Iran’s largest banks, which
extends to the payment sanctions imposed by Swift in March of last year. This
represents the second such judgment against the banking sanctions and brings
into question the legitimacy of using the Swift payments network as an economic
weapon.
On Tuesday, the EU’s General Court ruled that, in the case of
Bank Saderat, there was insufficient evidence demonstrating that the bank was
involved in Iran’s nuclear program. Last week, the court issued a similar
ruling in the case of Bank Mellat, the largest private sector lender in Iran.
Boycotted by the EU since July 2010 and blocked out of Swift since March 2012,
the two banks had filed suit with the European court to challenge those
sanctions. EU
New restrictions would:
--Give recipients of court-approved subpoenas for information in terrorist investigations the right to challenge a requirement that they refrain from telling anyone.
--Eliminate a requirement that an individual provide the FBI with the name of a lawyer consulted about a National Security Letter, which is a demand for records issued by investigators.
--Clarify that most libraries are not subject to demands in those letters for information about suspected terrorists.
The legislation also takes aim at the distribution and use of methamphetamine by limiting the supply of a key ingredient found in everyday cold and allergy medicines.
Yet another provision is designed to strengthen port security by imposing strict punishments on crew members who impede or mislead law enforcement officers trying to board their ships.
New York Times
Section 201 — Gives federal officials the authority to intercept wire, spoken and electronic communications relating to terrorism.
Subsection 203(b) — Permits the sharing of grand jury information that involves foreign intelligence or counterintelligence with federal law enforcement, intelligence, protective, immigration, national defense or national security officials
Section 204 — Makes clear that nothing in the law regarding pen registers — an electronic device which records all numbers dialed from a particular phone line — stops the government‘s ability to obtain foreign intelligence information.
Section 207 — Increases the amount of time that federal officials may watch people they suspect are spies or terrorists.
Section 212 — Permits Internet service providers and other electronic communication and remote computing service providers to hand over records and e-mails to federal officials in emergency situations.
Section 215 — Authorizes federal officials to obtain "tangible items" like business records, including those from libraries and bookstores, for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.
Section 218 — Allows federal officials to wiretap or watch suspects if foreign intelligence gathering is a "significant purpose" for seeking a Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act order. The pre-Patriot Act standard said officials could ask for the surveillance only if it was the sole or main purpose.
Section 223 — Amends the federal criminal code to provide for administrative discipline of federal officers or employees who violate prohibitions against unauthorized disclosures of information gathered under this act.
Section 225 — Amends FISA to prohibit lawsuits against people or companies that provide information to federal officials for a terrorism investigation.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home