ruminations on international financing and whatever
Monday, March 04, 2013
E.U. asked to cut off Iran's SWIFT access
oil sanctions
European Union leaders are scheduled to meet March 7 to consider a U.S. proposal that the E.U. cut off Iran’s access to a central European financial system that enables global transactions in euros, according to U.S. government officials apprised of the meeting.
U.S. officials have criticized the E.U. for allowing Iran to carry out financial transactions via the European Central Bank (ECB), which U.S. government officials say allows Tehran to skirt Western economic sanctions
Reuters is reporting that a European Union court has ruled
against the EU banking sanctions imposed on one of Iran’s largest banks, which
extends to the payment sanctions imposed by Swift in March of last year. This
represents the second such judgment against the banking sanctions and brings
into question the legitimacy of using the Swift payments network as an economic
weapon.
On Tuesday, the EU’s General Court ruled that, in the case of
Bank Saderat, there was insufficient evidence demonstrating that the bank was
involved in Iran’s nuclear program. Last week, the court issued a similar
ruling in the case of Bank Mellat, the largest private sector lender in Iran.
Boycotted by the EU since July 2010 and blocked out of Swift since March 2012,
the two banks had filed suit with the European court to challenge those
sanctions. EU
Bank deposits with the ECB now stand at their highest level since June 2010 at €905bn (£772bn) as lenders withdraw deposits held with their peers and put them into the central bank. At the same time, banks in major eurozone countries such as France and Italy have become increasingly reliant on central bank funding. This follows the trend seen in smaller countries like Ireland where lenders have effectively becomes taxpayer-funded "zombie" banks. The European banking sector's problems are being exacerbated by a wave of asset sales as lenders look to dramatically shrink their balance sheets. UBS estimates eurozone banks could sell off between €3.7 trillion and €4.5 trillion of assets in the next three years. The financial resources to bail out Europe must primarily come from within the continent, the official said, adding that the IMF cannot substitute for a European show of force. President Barack Obama has stressed that Europe has the means to resolve its crisis. Europe simply needs to muster the political will, Obama said December 8, As part of the summit, European Union members agreed to raise as much as 200 billion euros, or $267 billion, for loans the International Monetary Fund could offer to debt-wracked nations on the continent. But European officials failed to increase the 500 billion euro, or $689 billion, cap on their own bailout lending funds.
Financial instrument includes not only debt securities, equity securities, and derivatives, but also loans and accounts payable or receivable, and almost any other amount payable or receivable.
Financial instruments can be initially and subsequently measured at fair value (a current value) in the balance sheet. Current accounting standards of both the IASB and FASB require that some financial instruments be reported at fair value (trading securities and derivatives, for example). Current IASB standards give companies the option of reporting other financial instruments at fair value and the FASB recently issued an Exposure Draft of a Statement that would provide a similar option within U.S. GAAP
New restrictions would:
--Give recipients of court-approved subpoenas for information in terrorist investigations the right to challenge a requirement that they refrain from telling anyone.
--Eliminate a requirement that an individual provide the FBI with the name of a lawyer consulted about a National Security Letter, which is a demand for records issued by investigators.
--Clarify that most libraries are not subject to demands in those letters for information about suspected terrorists.
The legislation also takes aim at the distribution and use of methamphetamine by limiting the supply of a key ingredient found in everyday cold and allergy medicines.
Yet another provision is designed to strengthen port security by imposing strict punishments on crew members who impede or mislead law enforcement officers trying to board their ships.
New York Times
Section 201 — Gives federal officials the authority to intercept wire, spoken and electronic communications relating to terrorism.
Subsection 203(b) — Permits the sharing of grand jury information that involves foreign intelligence or counterintelligence with federal law enforcement, intelligence, protective, immigration, national defense or national security officials
Section 204 — Makes clear that nothing in the law regarding pen registers — an electronic device which records all numbers dialed from a particular phone line — stops the government‘s ability to obtain foreign intelligence information.
Section 207 — Increases the amount of time that federal officials may watch people they suspect are spies or terrorists.
Section 212 — Permits Internet service providers and other electronic communication and remote computing service providers to hand over records and e-mails to federal officials in emergency situations.
Section 215 — Authorizes federal officials to obtain "tangible items" like business records, including those from libraries and bookstores, for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.
Section 218 — Allows federal officials to wiretap or watch suspects if foreign intelligence gathering is a "significant purpose" for seeking a Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act order. The pre-Patriot Act standard said officials could ask for the surveillance only if it was the sole or main purpose.
Section 223 — Amends the federal criminal code to provide for administrative discipline of federal officers or employees who violate prohibitions against unauthorized disclosures of information gathered under this act.
Section 225 — Amends FISA to prohibit lawsuits against people or companies that provide information to federal officials for a terrorism investigation.